Grant: #73048

Grantee Institution: Public Agenda, Inc.

Principal Investigator: David Schleifer, Ph.D.

Grant Period: October 1, 2015 – July 31, 2017

Budget: $399,130

As individuals and families pay a greater share of health care costs, many stakeholders are working to increase price and quality transparency to help individuals choose high value care.  However, public reporting of price and quality information may not necessarily address consumers’ needs, sources are inconsistent in how they report such information, and experts disagree on how best to measure quality.  The researchers will employ a mixed methods design involving a literature review and expert interviews, focus groups, and a nationally representative internet survey to understand consumers’ valuation practices, information needs, and decision-making in three health care situations that affect large numbers of Americans, for which price and quality vary, and for which there is little representative research about consumer choice:  (1) care during pregnancy and childbirth; (2) joint replacement; and (3) management of type 2 diabetes.  The goal of this project is to inform policymaker and stakeholder actions to improve conditions for consumers to choose safe, effective and reasonably priced care.

This project is funded as part of the Robert Wood Johnson  Foundation’s solicitation “Optimizing Value in Health Care: Consumer-focused Trends from the Field,” which supports studies that address consumer perceptions of value in the new and emerging health care landscape.

Publications

Study Snapshot: People Value Different Aspects of Quality Care Depending on Their Health Needs
AcademyHealth | November 2017

Qualities That Matter: Public Perceptions of Quality in Diabetes Care, Joint Replacement and Maternity Care
Public Agenda | July 2017