February 2004
Substance Abuse and Welfare Reform: Comprehensive Programs Needed to Address Recipients’ Multiple Problems

References

Atkinson, J.S. et al. “The relationship among psychological distress, employment, and drug use over time in a sample of female TANF recipients,” Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2003, pp. 1–12.

Atkinson, J.S. et al. “Employment and income patterns in a study of a chronic drug-using and non-drug-using TANF population,” Journal of Poverty, Vol. 7, No. 4 (in press).

Brown, V.L. et al. “Trends of criminal activity and substance use in a sample of welfare recipients,” Crime and Delinquency (in press).

Chandler, D. and J. Meisel. “The prevalence of mental health, alcohol and other drug and domestic violence issues among CalWORKS: Participants in Kern and Stanislaus Counties,” Sacramento, CA: California Institute for Mental Health, 2000.

Danziger, S. et al. “Barriers to the employment of welfare recipient,” Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Michigan, February 2000.

Danziger, S.K. and K. Seefeldt. “Barriers to employment and the ‘hard to serve’: Implications for services, sanctions, and time limits,” Focus (newsletter for the Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison), Vol. 22, No. 1, 2002, pp. 76–81.

Gutman, M.A. et al. “Characteristics of substance abusing women on welfare (TANF): Findings from the evaluation of ‘CASAWORKS for Families’ pilot demonstration,” Evaluation Review (in press-a).

Gutman, M.A. et al. “Potential barriers to work for substance abusing women on welfare: Findings from the ‘CASAWORKS for Families’ pilot demonstration,” Evaluation Review (in press-b).

Jayakody, R. et al. “Welfare reform, substance use, and mental health,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2000, pp. 623–50.

Kaestner, R. “Drug use and AFDC participation: Is there a connection?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1998, pp. 493–520.

Legal Action Center. “State, local welfare officials see important role for drugs and alcohol treatment in welfare reform,” Washington, D.C.: Legal Action Center, 1995.

McLellan, A.T. et al. “One-year outcomes from the ‘CASAWORKS for Families’ intervention for substance abusing-women on welfare,” Evaluation Review (in press).

Metsch, L.R. et al. “Welfare and work outcomes after substance abuse treatment,” Social Service, June 2003, pp. 237–54.

Montoya, I.D. et al. “Comparison of psychosocial barriers among welfare recipients: implications for drug treatment and health services," Substance Use and Misuse, Vol. 36, 2001, pp. 771–88.

Montoya, I.D. et al. “Prevalence of hepatitis C in a drug using and non-using welfare population,” Health Policy, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2003, pp. 221–8.

Montoya, I.D. et al. “Mental health, drug use and the transition from welfare to work,” Journal of Behavioral Health Services Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2002, pp. 144–56.

Morgenstern, J. et al. “Intensive case management improves substance abuse and employment outcomes of female welfare recipients: Preliminary findings,” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, September 2002.

Morgenstern, J. et al. “Barriers to employability among substance dependent and nonsubstance-affected women on federal welfare: Implications for program design,” Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Vol. 64, 2003, pp. 239-246.

Morgenstern, J. et al. “CASAWORKS for Families: A new treatment model for substance abusing parenting women on welfare,” Evaluation Review (in press).

Morgenstern, J. et al. “Specialized screening approaches can substantially increase the identification of substance abuse problems among welfare recipients,” Research Notes. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Services Policy, January 2001.

Nakashian, M. “Substance abuse and welfare reform,” Journal of American Medical Women’s Association, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2002, pp. 36–7.

Parra, G. “Welfare reform and substance abuse: Innovative state strategies,” National Health Policy Forum, 771, March 7, 2002, pp. 1–16.

Pollack, H.A. et al. “Drug-testing welfare recipients: False negatives, false positives, unanticipated opportunities,” Women’s Health Issue, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2002, pp. 23–31.

Pollack, H.A. et al. “Substance abuse among welfare recipients: Trends and policy responses,” Social Service Review, Vol. 72, No. 2, 2002, pp. 256–74.

Schmidt, L.A. and D. McCarty. “Welfare reform and the changing landscape of substance abuse services for low-income women,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Vol. 24, No. 8, 2000, pp. 1298–1311.

Seefeldt, K.S. and S.M. Orzol. “Watching the clock tick: TANF accumulation in a strong economy,” University of Michigan Program on Poverty and Social Welfare Policy working paper, 2003.

Spieglman, R. et al. Alameda County CalWORKs needs assessment: A look at potential health-related barriers to self-sufficiency (Report No. 1). Berkeley, California: Public Health Institute, 1999.

Strawn, J. Substance abuse and welfare reform, Welfare Information Network Issue Note, 1997, www.financeprojectinfo.org/Publications/hardtoplace.htm.

Wickizer, T. M. The Impact of Substance Abuse Treatment on Employment Outcomes Among AFDC Clients in Washington State. (DHHS Publication No. SMA 00-3451). Rockville, MD, 2000.